LM Studio mit deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-7b

[Sinspin]

<sarkasmus>
Ich verstehe nicht was Du hast. Das ist doch alles korrekt und richtig.
Du bist sicher aus einem parallelen Universum. Oder hast die letzte Runde Hirnschrupfen für "collective geistige Verblödung" verpasst.
</sakasmus>

Ich finde AI wirklich eine tolle Sache. Doch nichts von dem ist schon alltagstauglich. Trotzdem sieht es so aus als wenn auf Teufel-komm-raus versucht wird alles mit AI zu erledigen was nur geht. Selbst wenn die Trainingsdaten von einer illegalen Müllkippe kommen.

[AuronTLG]

Noch 2-3 Jahre, dann haben wir eine geschlossene Müll-Endlosschleife:
Jede KI ist dann mit dem Müll trainiert, der von anderen KIs erzeugt wurde, die mit Müll trainiert wurden, der von anderen KIs erzeugt wurde, die mit Müll...

Garbage in, garbage out, forever...

[Ydobon]

Hängt davon ab, was bei den kleineren wegdestilliert und dann zusammengesucht wird.
Mit 14b war meine Antwort

Zitat:

Okay, so I'm trying to figure out what Rad Studio is. The user mentioned that it's a Borland product but now sold
by Embarcadero. Hmm, I remember hearing about Borland before; they were involved in some software development
tools.

Wait, wasn't there a company called Borland that used to make things like Turbo Pascal and maybe other IDEs? Yeah,
I think Turbo C was another one. So Rad Studio must be something related to that. Maybe it's an integrated
development environment (IDE) for programming?

The user also said that after Borland, Embarcadero took over the product. I'm not too familiar with Embarcadero,
but I think they're known for some IDEs as well. They might have acquired Rad Studio from Borland.

I should check what Rad Studio is exactly. Let me see... Oh right, Rad Studio is an IDE that supports multiple
programming languages and platforms. It probably includes tools for cross-platform development because I remember
reading about it supporting Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, etc.

So Borland developed Rad Studio as a powerful tool for building applications across different platforms. Then, at
some point, Embarcadero bought the product line from Borland. That makes sense because companies often acquire
other software products to expand their offerings.

Therefore, Rad Studio is an IDE sold by Embarcadero now, which was originally developed by Borland. It's used for
creating applications across various platforms using different programming languages supported by its components.
</think>

Rad Studio is an integrated development environment (IDE) that was initially developed by Borland, a company known
for creating tools like Turbo Pascal and Turbo C. After Borland sold the product line to Embarcadero, it became
known as Rad Studio and is now maintained and marketed by Embarcadero.

Rad Studio supports cross-platform application development, allowing users to create applications for various
platforms including Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and more. It offers tools for multiple programming languages,
making it a versatile choice for developers looking to build applications across different environments.

70b nun wieder

Zitat:

Okay, so I'm trying to figure out this question about RAD Studio. The user mentioned that RAD Studio is a Borland
product and then asked what the RAD Studio sold by Embarcadero is. Hmm, I remember hearing that Borland was
involved in some software development tools back in the day.

I think RAD stands for Rapid Application Development, which makes sense because it's a tool for building
applications quickly. So RAD Studio must be an integrated development environment (IDE) or something similar. Now,
Borland had several products like Delphi and C++ Builder if I recall correctly. Those were popular for Windows
development, especially with Pascal and C++.

Wait, but the question is about Embarcadero selling RAD Studio now. So maybe there was some company transition or
acquisition? I think I remember that Borland sold off some of their tools division to another company a while
back. Let me try to piece this together.

So, Borland Software Corporation had several development tools, including Delphi, C++ Builder, and JBuilder if I'm
not mistaken. These were part of their IDE offerings. Then around the mid-2000s, they started focusing more on
enterprise software and sold off their developer tools division. The buyer was a company called Embarcadero
Technologies.

Embarcadero took over these products and has since continued to develop and support them. So RAD Studio is now
under Embarcadero's umbrella. It probably includes Delphi, which allows developers to create cross-platform
applications using Pascal, and maybe C++ Builder as well for C++ development. They might have added more features
like support for mobile platforms or cloud integrations over the years.

I also think that Embarcadero has kept updating RAD Studio with new versions regularly, adding modern features to
keep it relevant in today's development landscape. So when someone refers to RAD Studio now, they're talking about
the version maintained by Embarcadero, which evolved from Borland's original product.

So putting it all together: RAD Studio was originally a Borland product, part of their development tools suite.
When Borland sold that division to Embarcadero, Embarcadero took over and now sells RAD Studio as one of their
flagship products, continuing its development and support.
</think>

RAD Studio, an integrated development environment (IDE) initially developed by Borland Software Corporation, was
part of their toolset for rapid application development, particularly with Delphi and C++ Builder. In the
mid-2000s, Borland sold their developer tools division to Embarcadero Technologies. Since then, Embarcadero has
continued to develop and support RAD Studio, enhancing it with modern features such as cross-platform capabilities
and mobile support. Today, RAD Studio remains a key product for Embarcadero, widely used for developing
applications across various platforms.

Bei 7b bekomme ich auch eine etwas andere Antwort. Embarcadero gehört zu Red Hat und Rad Studio wird dort als Boron Studio weiter entwickelt.
Wenn man zuviel von der eigentlichen KI entfernt, bleibt halt manchmal nur Müll übrig. Delphi ist wohl nicht mehr so wichtig, so dass es schneller rausfliegt.

[dummzeuch]

Ich habe es jetzt hinbekommen, die "KI" in die IDE einzubinden. Jeder Aufruf dauert natürlich ewig, weil der PC dafür schlicht nicht geeignet ist. Aber es funktioniert.

Blöd ist, dass während sie auf die Antwort wartet, die IDE komplett blockiert ist. Ich will mir als Test gerade eine InsertionSort Implementation erklären lassen und hätte jetzt gerne den Sourcecode hier rein kopiert.

Edit: So, die Antwort ist da.

Code, der zu erklären war:

Delphi-Quellcode:

procedure SomeSort(Left, Right: Integer; CompareFunc: TCompareFunction; SwapProc: TSwapProcedure);
var
  I, J: Integer;
begin
  for I := Left + 1 to Right do begin
    J := I;
    while (J > Left) and (CompareFunc(J - 1, J) > 0) do begin
      SwapProc(J - 1, J);
      Dec(J);
    end;
  end;
end;

Erklärung

Zitat:

The code provided is
an implementation of the **bubble sort** algorithm tailored to use custom comparison and swap
functions. Here's a step-by-step explanation:

1. **Procedure Definition**: `SomeSort` takes four
parameters: two integers (`Left` and `Right`) defining the range of indices, a function pointer
`CompareFunc`, and a procedure pointer `SwapProc`.

2. **Loop Structure**:
- The outer loop
runs from `Left + 1` to `Right`, setting an index `I` for each iteration.
- For each `I`,
initialize another index `J` to `I`.

3. **Comparison and Swapping**:
- A while loop checks if
`J` is greater than `Left` and if `CompareFunc(J-1, J)` returns a positive value, indicating
elements at positions `J-1` and `J` are out of order.
- If conditions are met, swap the elements
using `SwapProc`, then decrement `J`.

4. **Termination**:
- The process continues until all
elements in the specified range are sorted according to the comparison logic defined by
`CompareFunc`.

This implementation is akin to a custom bubble sort that uses user-defined
functions for comparisons and swaps, ensuring flexibility in sorting criteria while maintaining an
in-place sorting mechanism.

Hm, Ich bin auch da nicht wirklich überzeugt.

[Rollo62]

Zitat von dummzeuch:

Ich habe es jetzt hinbekommen, die "KI" in die IDE einzubinden. Jeder Aufruf dauert natürlich ewig, weil der PC dafür schlicht nicht geeignet ist. Aber es funktioniert.

Das kommt natürlich auf die Hardware an.
Mit den Cloud-Services geht es zwar flott, aber das "Rendern" der Texte dauert halt auch seine Zeit.
Im DeepResearch bei OpenAI kann der mal locker ein paar Minuten nachdenken.
In der Zeit sollte natürlich nichts blockieren ...

Mit eigener Hardware:
Die echten KI-Beschleuniger kann sich ein "Normalsterblicher" kaum leisten.
Es hört sich so an, als würdest Du eine lokale Hardware nutzen, welche GPU hast Du denn im PC verbaut?
Ich denke mit weniger als NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 sollte man gar nicht anfangen.
Mit MacMini und M2+ geht es allerdings auch relativ flott.
Wenn es schneller sein soll kann man auch externe GPU's in der Cloud nutzen, aber dann bist Du wieder in der Cloud ...

[dummzeuch]

Zitat von Rollo62:

Es hört sich so an, als würdest Du eine lokale Hardware nutzen, welche GPU hast Du denn im PC verbaut?

Ich schrieb ja schon, der PC ist "eher schwachbrüstig". Es ist ein Mini-PC, der schon mehrere Jahre auf dem Buckel hat und die Intel Onboard-Grafik verwendet: Ein Fujitsu Esprimo Q920. Aufgerüstet mit SSD und 16 GB RAM reicht der problemlos für Delphi, Libre Office und ein paar simple Spiele, sowie als Terminal Server Client für Homeoffice. Für KI nicht wirklich geeignet, aber das war ja auch nicht der Zweck.