Direct2D Anwendung

[TiGü]

I think the problem with the MfPack translations is that at some point they took the order from the MSDN website (or auto-generated documentation) instead of using the real header files from the Windows SDK one-to-one.

[Kas Ob.]

Zitat von TiGü:

I think the problem with the MfPack translations is that at some point they took the order from the MSDN website (or auto-generated documentation) instead of using the real header files from the Windows SDK one-to-one.

No, the problem is not that, Windows SDK header and the documentation are correct and identical, the problem exist in Microsoft compiler and undocumented behaviour, this is what cause this mess, the compiler rearrange VTable layout at its own, hence producing its own layout that will work and always work with the same headers, the problem is different compilers will follow strict layout and this layout doesn't with the binary produced by lets say VS compiler, but all these headers belong to Windows components that produced by that quirky compiler and hence all other compilers need to adjust their own header to make their own binary compatible with these shipped with/for Windows, in this case Media Foundation and DirectX ( yes Direct3d and DirectDraw both suffer from this very strange binary when it comes to overloaded interface methods)

[pcoder]

Zitat von TiGü:

using the real header files from the Windows SDK one-to-one.

Im SDK header (.h) file gibt es keine Beschreibung der ABI-Reihenfolge, kann deshalb nicht! verwendet werden.

[TiGü]

Ach du Scheiße, es stimmt.
Dann ist ja auch gar nichts Verlass und der Aufruf von COM-Interfaces vom Windows Betriebssystem Komponenten mit überladenen Methoden ist mehr oder weniger zufällig:

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/an...svgelement-api
https://github.com/FactoryXCode/MfPack/issues/4
https://github.com/microsoft/win32metadata/issues/600 (check kennykerrs Antwort)
https://github.com/microsoft/win32metadata/issues/815
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/...-the-same-name

[Kas Ob.]

Zitat von TiGü:

Ach du Scheiße, es stimmt.
Dann ist ja auch gar nichts Verlass und der Aufruf von COM-Interfaces vom Windows Betriebssystem Komponenten mit überladenen Methoden ist mehr oder weniger zufällig:

*Browser translation : with overloaded methods is more or less random*
It is not random at all, it is consistent just not documented, and specific only to the compiler that Microsoft used to build Windows and its component.

So for other compilers to comply and compile a binary compatible with Microsoft Built binaries, the headers for other languages (and compilers, being Delphi or even C++ or...) must be adjusted manually.